Ritter Seeking Right-to-Die Legislation for Terminally Ill Patients

Montville's state representative is pushing a new piece of controversial legislation.


The following is a press release from the office of Rep. Betsy Ritter:

State Rep. Betsy Ritter (D-Montville), joined by other legislators, clergy members, doctors and advocates, spoke out Tuesday in favor of right-to-die legislation that would allow terminally ill, mentally competent patients the option of choosing medical assistance to carry out their final wishes.

Ritter told a press conference in Hartford that she hopes the legislation, which has been taken up by the legislature’s Public Health Committee, would lead to a full discussion of the rights of individuals and subsequent passage of the bill.

“Patients should be able to make their own decisions about the final minutes of their lives. It’s their right and no one else’s,” Ritter said.

Barbara Coombs Lee, president of Compassion & Choices, said aid-in-dying laws in Oregon, Washington and now Montana are working as intended and none of the problems opponents predicted have come true.

Doctors, patients, clergy and the majority of Connecticut residents support the right of patients to make end-of-life decisions without government interference, she said. Critics raise fears of abuse or coercion but evidence and experience do not support these fears. Connecticut’s residents should enjoy freedom both in how to live and, when their time comes, how to die, she said. 

Many dying patients suffer, even with the best care and pain management. Others fear their pain will become unbearable. Supporters of Connecticut’s legislation say people should have a full range of end-of-life choices, including the right to request and obtain life-ending medication.

Experience, in states with explicit permission for aid in dying, show that very few patients actually request, and even fewer actually self-administer, medication – only 673 people in Oregon have done so in 15 years since the law’s passage.  But thousands more take comfort just in knowing the option is available, according to Coombs Lee, who noted that end-of-life care has actually improved under the Oregon law.

The Connecticut bill would be based on Oregon and Washington state statutes, and would allow a terminally ill person with a diagnosis of less than six months to live, who is deemed mentally and psychologically competent, to get a prescription that can be self-administered for a humane and dignified death, supporters said.

The legislation would include protections to ensure that patients are not coerced or influenced in their decision-making.

Would you support a right-to-die law? Tell us in the comments. 

Elizabeth February 06, 2013 at 01:33 PM
I would absolutely support a right to die law. We treat our pets more humanely than people in their last months of life.
mdm February 10, 2013 at 09:53 PM
My wife died last year of a GBM - brain cancer. I believe that my wife and I and the rest of her family would have been saved much pain and torment, if an option such as this would have been available. When you have to watch a loved one, in hospice, who has had a ton of pain killer, still motioning "upwards" when you are trying to find out how their pain level is because they cannot talk - "Five?" "Six?" "Eight?" Come on. Torture and day/nightmare memories for the rest of my life. Thanks. Who the heck would even consider saying no to a set of laws that would end such horror.
CU Seaside February 21, 2013 at 06:50 PM
I couldn't agree more. People should have a choice on how they pass from this life. Endless suffering and pain should not be necessary. I want to have a choice on my end of life.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »